AI & Dyslexia: Promise, Pitfalls, and the Enduring Role of Literacy Practitioners

Introduction

For many parents of children with dyslexia, the rapid rise of AI tools like ChatGPT can feel like a double-edged sword. On one hand, they offer new possibilities for support, scaffolding, and access. On the other, they raise valid concerns about dependence, accuracy, and the integrity of learning. In this post I’ll aim to give you a balanced view: what’s new, how these tools can help — and where the human side of literacy instruction remains absolutely critical now and into the future.

How AI Can Help

• Easier writing & reading: AI can check spelling, grammar, and simplify tricky text so kids can focus on ideas instead of mechanics.
• Instant feedback: 24/7 support to brainstorm, rephrase, or explain unfamiliar words.
• Confidence boost: Reduces frustration and helps kids get their thoughts out faster.

Watch for the Risks

• Overreliance: Too much AI can stop kids from practicing core reading and spelling skills.
• Mistakes & misinformation: AI sometimes gives wrong or odd answers; kids need to check and think critically.
• Ethics: Children may be tempted to submit AI’s work as their own.

Why Human Literacy Support Still Matters

• Tailored, evidence-based instruction: Practitioners like those at LiteracyTLC teach the foundational decoding, spelling, and comprehension skills AI can’t.
• Guidance using AI wisely: Professionals can show kids when and how to use AI as a tool — not a crutch.
• Emotional and motivational support: Building confidence and resilience still requires a caring human connection.

So, the goal is not to reject AI, but to use it wisely, under guidance, and in balance with instruction that builds the underlying skills.

Why Literacy Practitioners Are More Important Than Ever

In this shifting landscape, the human side of literacy instruction, like what your team at LiteracyTLC provides, becomes even more vital. Here’s why:

1. Tailored, structured instruction - Dyslexia interventions rely on evidence-based, multisensory, structured literacy approaches (e.g. Orton-Gillingham, Wilson, Lindamood). These are not things AI can reliably replace — they require human assessment, scaffolding, error correction, and real-time adjustment.‍
2. Scaffolding metacognition & strategies- A practitioner can teach how to think about errors, set goals, monitor progress, and internalize habits like self-editing, reflection, and strategic planning — skills that AI alone can’t fully teach.‍
3. Ethical scaffolding & guided use of AI - Learners need meta-instruction about when and how to lean on AI — how to question, verify, use it as a draft tool, and resist overuse. Practitioners can guide this “AI literacy.”‍
4. Emotional support and motivation - Dyslexia often carries emotional weight: frustration, self-esteem, anxiety. A caring human tutor or practitioner can encourage, validate, set appropriate challenge, and maintain morale in ways AI can’t.‍
5. Transfer, generalization, and unstructured tasks - Real-world reading and writing are messy. Practitioners help apply skills to novel tasks, cross-curricular work, nonstandard texts, and students’ interests. They bridge between structured practice and real contexts.
6. Ongoing adaptation & feedback - As a child grows, their needs shift. A practitioner tracks this — deciding when to fade supports, when to introduce new tools, when to revisit fundamentals.
   

So while AI provides exciting new tools, it does not—and cannot—render human-led literacy support obsolete. In fact, the more sophisticated AI becomes, the more nuanced and human the pedagogy must remain.

Looking Ahead: A Balanced Future

The integration of AI into literacy support is still in its early days. But based on current trends, some forward-looking observations:

• AI tools will become more fine-tuned for dyslexic processing (e.g. better error modeling, more flexible scaffolds, multimodal support).
• Hybrid models (AI + tutor) may become the norm: AI handling low-level scaffolding, human experts guiding strategy, metacognition, and emotional support.
• Schools and systems will need to adjust norms, assessment practices, and policy around AI use—balancing accessibility with rigor.
• The role of practitioners will shift: less “drill delivery,” more coaching, oversight of tool use, strategy development, and meta-learning.
  

In short: AI can be a powerful new tool in the literacy toolbox — but literacy practitioners remain, and will remain, indispensable. The human connection, the ability to see patterns, adapt to nuance, and nurture confidence — that is not something an algorithm can replicate fully.

Conclusion & Call to Action

For parents navigating the evolving landscape of AI and dyslexia:

• Be curious but cautious: try small experiments, monitor carefully, and maintain balance.
• Insist on strong foundational instruction, not shortcuts.
• Foster your child’s metacognitive thinking around writing and reading.
• Seek expert guidance on integrating AI tools without losing key skill development.
  

At LiteracyTLC, our goal is to partner with you — helping children build strong literacy foundations and helping them take advantage of new tools wisely. If you’d like to talk more about how AI might (or might not) fit into your child’s learning plan, we’d be happy to consult with you.

‍